Wednesday, May 23, 2007

O8 Juice

There were a couple of big hands last night that permitted to check out with a tidy little stack. The first was all about luck.... I had the A, 2, 2, 3 and the board flopped 1 to the low. Elvie leads out (sitting immediately to my left) with a $200 bet and everyone calls. The turn brings a 2nd low card Elvie makes a about a $400 bet all-in and there are 3-4 callers. The river brings in in my nut low and Elvie and chop about a $3600 pot. He flopped bottom set and it actually held up!


The next big hand for me was involved with John M and Rick.... I've got the Ac, 2c, 5s, 6h and there is the usual straddle pre-flop of around $30 or so. The flop brings the As, 3h, 5h and sacre' bleu'... it checked all around. The turn brought the 5c and I really like my little boat. There was no re-raise pre-flop which most this table would have done had they been the proud owner of pocket Aces so I really believe that my boat works for high. I lead out with a $75 bet and John M calls.... it seems as if the Juice made his normal.... "I'm not going to give Charles any of my chips" and folded. LOL. Rick smooth calls. The river brought the 7h and the Juice was talking about the straight flush out there, but I really wasn't worried about that since I had the 6h in my hand. The only hand that I'm a little concerned about may be pocket 7's, but not even I could be that unlucky... I bet $150, John M calls and Rick raises $325. I call and John folds showing a 3's fulls of 5's boat. Rick had the nut low and we chopped.


One of the last hands that I played was with John M. I was in middle position and he raised the $20 straddle to $255. I'm pretty certain that it folded around to me. I think that Rick really wanted to play but he was in no man's land just a couple of seats away from John's $255 raise. When it gets to me, I find Ad, Ah, 2h, 7d.... I like it! So I decide to push really just wanting to take it down right there, but realizing that it would be more likely for us to show up and find that J-Rod had cleaned the poker felt.... wait... that happened. Well, it was still unlikely. I raise all-in and I've got about $1900 or so in front of me. John has another $500-$600 and it folds to him and he cannot wait to call. He turns over Q, Q, 4, 5 double suited. The flop was sweet.... As, 4d, 5h! Sweet! The top set, a live deuce and John almost drawing dead. The turn was a beautiful 3d. The river, a harmless 6. The table talk indicated that I had a let everyone else play, I would have been quartered on the low and someone would have made a higher straight.

My Hand:


The Board:


There were two different hands last night that Rick flopped absolute MONSTERS! I hope that he'll blog them.... in one, he had A, A, 3, 4 and flopped A, 2, 5! Come on, replay it for us!

Back to the "CLEAN" felt! Thanks ... J-Rod!

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

NBC's Poker After Dark

Poker Superstars - Mike Matusow vs Gus Hansen

The Crap I've Seen....

I was playing in a small tournament on Sunday in Cary and got to see some scary stuff! This one particular hand.... oh, the tournament, $60/$25/$25, you get $3,000 in chips and the re-buys get you an additional $2,000 (anytime your chip count falls below $2,000) and the add-on gets you an additional $5,000 in chips. At any rate, I think we're down to five players and the flop comes Jd, 8d, 7d and there's a raise, a re-raise and an all-in. They turn over their cards.... one guy has Kd and I don't remember the other card, but it wasn't a diamond. The young man to my immediate left had flopped the Queen high flush and with the Qd, 9d and immediately began calling for the 10d. He must have known from experience what was about to happen. The turn brought the Ad and of course the river brought the 10d.... Straight Flush! Whee!

Hand 1:



Hand 2:

as suspected... the 2nd card didn't matter!

The Flop:



The Turn:




The River:


At any rate, you know with that kind of luck floating around that I didn't last long...

Back to the felt!

Monday, May 21, 2007

We Want You to BLOG!

We Want YOU to Blog!

We have a core group of repeat bloggers, but we want YOU to blog.... Why should you blog? There's a lot of great reasons.... entertainment, bragging rights, ridiculing your own play and those.... I-can't-believe-you-called-me-with-that-donkey-plays that not only hit, but when they hit, they raise you..... whoever heard of such a thing! Probably the best reason is that when you listen to the winners of bracelets and major tournaments, most of them speak of being a part of a "think-tank" ... a place or a group of like-minded friends who play poker together and then dissect and analyze the hands. Of course, you would never do this at the poker table.... that would be poor etiquette! But to dissect and analyze for learning purposes is exactly what we are striving to create with this blog. Of course, you will be able to ridicule each other for the obvious "TILT" plays that we all make from time to time. And.... HORNS BLARING.... it's all FREE! Blogging on this site is by invitation only and you are cordially invited to join, blog, poke-fun, ridicule and learn with the group! Some of the best players in the area frequent our site and we want you to be part of it! Just email me at ncpokerblog@gmail.com and I'll forward you the invitation to join us.

Sunday, May 20, 2007

It's All About the Redraw!

Another Friday night meant another trip to Cary for our weekly session of $2/5 PL Omaha 8. We had a full table fairly quickly. In fact, a couple players came in after we filled up, chose not to wait, and left to head to another game. Believe me, besides spilling cold beer or dropping pizza on the floor, nothing breaks my heart more than watching money walk out the door. Sadly, my pleas for the tighter players (Tom, Raj, etc.) to get up and go home fell on deaf ears…

Not to worry, I was still surrounded by enough loose players to make the night an enjoyable one. After playing a few hours of mostly solid poker (it is Omaha - you have to gamble a little), I gradually built up a nice little stack of around $2k. Then came the big hand of the night, and one that’s a perfect example of the importance of having a good redraw in this game.

I’m in position and get one of my favorite types of starting hands – two-suited with two sets of connectors, one low and one high. This particular hand I have 2h-4h-10s-Qs, call the usual live straddle along with most of the rest of the table, and we’re off to the flop. The flop is a left hook to the jaw, 8h-9s-Jh, giving me the nuts, the heart redraw, and backdoor spade and low draws. Action is to Elvie, who bets the pot. It folds to Akash, who repots!
My Hand:
The Flop:


To me, I now have to make the key decision of the night – how fast to play my hand. In general, I don’t like committing too many chips until the turn, for a couple reasons. First, a pot-sized flop bet usually isn’t big enough to get drawing hands out (though in this situation, a re-raise from me makes it tough for Elvie to call with just a draw). Second, it’s a lot easier for most players to fold a draw with one card to come than two. Akash has a pretty big stack himself, and I can easily put him on Q-10 as well. I don’t have enough information yet to determine what Elvie has – he could easily be leading out with a set, nut flush draw, or the sucker straight. If so, I want him in the pot. If the turn is ugly, I can still easily get away from my hand relatively cheaply. After taking a few moments, I decide to take a small chance and smooth-call, and hope for a brick on the turn. Elvie calls as well, and there’s a nice pot a-brewing.

I’m trying to use my psychic powers to conjure up a low spade on the turn (an ace would be perfect). Very close – the turn brings a 4s. Though it takes away my low draw, I love this card, as I now have two flush draws to go with my nut straight. It doesn’t take long for the three of us to get all the chips in. Elvie and Akash both turn up Q-10 (wow, three of us flop the nuts!), with Akash having two-pair as well. Neither of them has a low draw or flush draw, so I’m in even better shape than I thought I was. Well, it’s a good thing nobody else has a heart draw, because a sweet little 7h comes on the river, allowing my 4-high flush to scoop a monster pot of over $4k!
The Turn:

The River:


As we’ve all seen too many times, having the nuts on the turn usually means you’re about to lose a lot of money. Omaha is a game of draws, and the only thing better than having a great draw on the turn is having the nuts along with it. Yep, it’s all about the redraw – can it be a coincidence that R-E-D-R-A-W anagrams to R-E-W-A-R-D? I think not!

See ya at the tables…
Rick

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Even I can hit the one outer every now and then!

Unlike John M... who seems to be hitting some monsters recently... I've been catching only a few monsters.... but that's ok, at least last night, I hit a few too. Probably the first big one came within an hour or so of kick-off. We're rotating a round of hold'em and then a round of O8.... $2/$5 No Limit of course. This particular hand was hold'em. I'm in the big blind and there is a $20 straddle and I think just about everyone played, so there's about $120 in the pot pre-flop.

I've got 8h, 9h and decide that I'll string along as well and the flop is 6c, 7h, 10s. It checks to me and I lead out with a $50 bet and get 4 callers. Ooops... I should have bet more. At any rate, the turn is a 5 diamonds and it checks to me and I bet $150 and get no callers. They did a little rabbit-hunting and the river was a harmless Ace of spades. Ellie commented that had he seen the Ace, he would have called.... top 2 pair.
My hand:





The Board:





The Next big hand for me followed shortly thereafter... I'm in late position with Ac, 3c, Js, 9h... not great, but everything is a monster in this game... pre-flop. There's a small straddle and I believe that everyone came into the pot. The flop was As, 3s, 7s and everyone checks.... it seems that some of the guys at this game like to check their flopped-nuts and there was a flush, but no one bet and it checked all the way around. The next card was sweet.... Ad, giving me the 2nd nut boat. It checks to me and I lead out with about a $75 bet and get 3 callers. The river is a 6.... I bet $150 and ended up chopping with someone's crappy low..... Nice!

My Hand:


The Board:


The last big hand of the night for me came later! I had 9c, 3c, 3h, 6h and the flop was Ax, 3x, 4x..... I'm never really excited about flopping the bottom set as so many times when you make a boat.... you lose! There was a potential wheel on the board and Frank lead out with about a $50 bet and there were 4 callers including me. I don't know why I put my money in the pot when I truly believe that I have one out. I guess it is because sometimes.... even I get lucky and hit it! And bang.... the fourth 3 hits the board on the turn. Now the hard part, trying to figure out how to play it to get as many chips in the pot as possible. Frank bets $90 and still 3 callers. The river puts another wheel card on the board and its hard for me to do it, but from first position, I check and Frank bets $200. Ellie immediately pushes all-in and I try to figure out if I can get Frank in. I believed that Frank had a boat and I was thinking that Ellie had a low which meant if I go crazy and raise, there's a chance that it'll be just me and Ellie chopping the smallish pot. Ellie has right at $1,000 and I've got him covered so I just smooth call. Frank puts both of us on the low and calls the $1,000 with 4's full of 3's. Ellie has the nut low and Ellie and I end up chopping a very nice pot.

There were a couple other nice hands played as well including one big pot that Rick and I chopped, but I'll let him tell you about that one.....
Back to the Felt!

Monday, May 14, 2007

Learn from the Pros: Knowing When To Quit

Who Was That Masked Man?!

Thursday night with The Juice (well, for one hand anyway). We had a short table Thursday night, with several people having other things going on. Still, it was a good group of guys, and a fun night overall. The night was strangely quiet, however, with the noticeable absence of Davey Boy. Dave, his wife Jamie, and a couple friends of theirs got a stretch limo and went out on the town (now there’s a scary thought). Midway through the night they stopped in to say hi, and (you know Dave…) the next thing you know, His Juiceness buys in for $400 and sits down to my right.

We’re playing Omaha 8, and I’m dealt Ad-3d-5d-Ks. While not a great hand, of course, it’ll do given the circumstances. With the others waiting, I know Dave’s chips will be in the middle of the table in the blink of an eye, and I’m damned sure going to stake my claim to his $400. Sure enough… raise, re-raise, re-raise, etc, and four of us are all-in preflop. There’s over $1,400 out there, and as usual, nobody turns their cards over until all five community cards have been dealt. God forbid someone should miss an opportunity to slow-roll…

As I’d mentioned in a previous post, Dave has been on this slow-roll kick lately. In other games this move might get your kneecaps broken – in his game it earns you street cred. I personally don’t like doing it, but I will sometimes make an exception for Our Hero (I did try it a few weeks ago against John S, but it just felt kind of weird). I figure whatever Davey gives me, I’ll give it back to him times ten. Well, except for chips, that is. As Willy Wonka would say: “Strike that…reverse it.”

But I digress – back to the hand.

So by the river the board ends up showing A-A-K-10-2, giving me the stone-cold nuts. Dave turns over A-10, and starts gloating more than he did after he lost his virginity to his college wrestling coach. Of course, I let him brag about how “That’s the way you do it!” for a few moments, going so far as to turn up the 3-5, shake my head and moan about my low not getting there. I let him scoop all the chips in front of him, including mine, before slowly turning up my A-K as well.

Sadly, it didn’t quite have the effect I had hoped (I obviously need more practice at this move…). I waited so long and did it so quietly that J-Rod, our intrepid dealer, grabbed my cards and pulled them into the muck with the others before I could even get a word out! Luckily, a couple other players saw my hand, but I spent the next minute or so convincing a shocked Dave that the chips he thought were his, as usual, really belonged to me. We were able to recreate the hands from the muck (and he tapes the game anyway), so it never really became an issue.

And then, like a summer storm, he was gone as quickly as he arrived. A lot of hurricanes will take your car with them when they leave. Dave (God bless him), actually leaves you enough money to buy a new car. Okay, so tonight it was only enough for a ’72 Pinto, but he did only play one hand.

And I heard him exclaim as he rode out of sight…”Piss on you all, it’s a hell of a night!”

See ya at the tables…
Rick

Texas Poker Bill Dead for Now

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Texas Poker Bill Dead for Now

The hopes of Texas poker players to have wider availability of poker in the state giving Hold'em its name came to a temporary halt recently. The proposed Texas State bill, HB 3186, failed to come up for consideration after being slotted toward the end of a full day of other bills.

According to the state legislature's rules, the proposed measure was dropped from further consideration after failing to reach the floor for its second reading before the midnight deadline, after being placed far down on a 23-page calendar including hundreds of matters up for discussion. The bill's fate was typical for a topic receiving lukewarm or newfound legislative support, procedurally throttled by opponents unwilling to consider expanding poker's legality within Texas at the present time.

The bill's sponsor, State Representative Jose Menendez, offered rueful commentary on a Dallas ESPN Radio broadcast last week as it became evident the bill would not make it up for a vote. "I'm very disappointed," said Menendez. "A lot of my colleagues are afraid that this voting for legalizing poker might hurt them in their next election. In particular, my Republican friends are the ones that are afraid of their primary voters." Menendez also emphasized the fact that his bill was intended to create a highly structured, regulatory environment for a pastime solidly supported by Texas residents in several public opinion polls.

Menendez (D-San Antonio) has not yet announced whether he will attempt to reintroduce his poker legislation. Most onlookers feel that no new effort on the Texas poker legislative front is likely to occur for at least the remainder of 2007.

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Friday, May 11, 2007

Rick's Laws of Omaha

Everyone knows Murphy’s Law. Though I’ve seen it worded in several different ways, the basic adage states that “Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong.” Most card players, especially those who play Omaha, will tell you that Murphy was an optimist. With the spirit of Edward Murphy in mind, I submit my own Laws of Omaha:

Law #1 - Don’t bet without the nuts.
The phrase should be tattooed into the forearms of all Omaha players as a constant reminder. This law becomes painfully obvious to anyone who has played the game for more than, oh, ten minutes. Luckily for my creditors, it remains the most widely-broken law in the game.

Law #2 - If you flop the nuts, you are about to lose a lot of money.
Boy is this a fact. The chances of two bricks coming are about the same as Jessica Alba and Scarlett Johansson showing up at my door offering to pay me to complete their fantasy threesome. Hang on a sec; I think I hear the doorbell…

Law #3 - If you turn the nuts, you’re probably drawing dead.
Okay, I’m back (damned Mormons!). If you happen to get lucky and hit your card on the turn, you’ll save money in the long run by just tossing your hand directly into the muck.

Law #4 - Don’t even think about bluffing.
Sheriff Buford T. Justice from the great state of Texas might say “Oh, you can think about it, but dooooon’t do it.” I say don’t even think about it. Most Omaha players, by nature, are not capable of laying down a hand. If you bet your busted flush draw, I guarantee someone will call $300 hoping his “live seven” is good for low, and will scoop the high also with his pocket nines.

Law #5 - If you have the nuts on the river, congratulations – you’re about to get quartered.
While this law is most often associated with the nut low, it’s also applicable to boats and straights as well. A good rule of thumb: If you have it, so does someone else.

Law #6 - If you flop a straight or flush, the turn will pair the board.
Every time….every time…

Law #7 - If you flop top set, the turn card will complete a straight, flush, or both.
Every time. The last time I flopped top set and actually had it hold up, Alaska and Hawaii were still territories.

Law #7a – If you flop top set and the turn pairs the board, you’re about to lose a big pot to quads.
You’ve been waiting patiently all night, you’ve finally got the top boat, and players are actually giving you action! You think you’re “walking the dog,” but trust me, the dog is walking you. That idiot who just called your large flop bet with bottom set is about to take your entire stack.

Law #8 – If you flop nut low draw, the turn and river will be face cards.
Guaranteed. You have A-2-3-6 with a flop of 4-5-10, and you make the rookie mistake of liking your hand. Well, my friend, prepare to be confronted with more paint than at a Sherwin-Williams superstore, making you wonder who slipped in the pinochle deck when you weren’t looking.

Law #9 - If you happen to hit your straight or flush card on the turn, there is a 100% chance the board will pair on the river (see Law #3).
In my opinion there is no sicker feeling than, after a night of being sucked out on time and time again, finally hitting a turn card yourself, only to have the #$^%* dealer immediately afterwards turn up someone else’s nut card. As I like to say: “One good turn deserves a river.”

Law #10 - If you flop middle set, you’re drawing to one out.
And if you’ve been paying attention, this is a good thing (see law #7a) – you’re a lock!

Law #11 – If you hold A-2, you will flop two-pair.
This is a certainty. Once the flop comes, your once-promising low hand becomes trash, and your now-crappy high hand has less chance of winning than Pauly Shore at the Oscars.

Law #12 – If you hit your card on the river, you can’t get sucked out on.
While this law universally applies to all poker games, it especially holds true in Omaha. Several times each session I hear a player beg the dealer to “flop him the nuts.” I usually say “Give him his wish, flop him the nuts but river me the nuts!”

By following these basic guidelines, you will soon find yourself getting much more enjoyment out of your Omaha game. To recap, avoid betting whenever possible – you will probably never see those chips again. Fold often, especially to a bet by me (remember, I only bet the nuts and I never bluff…). Lastly, try your best not to have anything until the river; then at least you’ll have a chance to win half the pot….

See ya at the tables…
Rick

O8 - Juice-less night....

Except for one hand.... yep, he came right in bought in for $400 and helped Rick quadruple up.... with a slow roll so slow that it was almost mucked. Yep, just played the one hand and left. Oh well... hopefully Rick will log in and tell you all about that one.

Well, it was one of the worst nights that I've had in a quite a while.... it just seemed like everyone's hand got there and if there was a card that could come that would cost me money, it did! I was quartered about 1/2 dozen times and lost to 4 bigger boats. I flopped only about 3 sets all night and guys with two pair would make better boats. Turned the nut straight twice and had a low get there that quartered me again.... Oh well, maybe we should have a spelling contest!

Oh, I just remembered one MONSTER..... I don't remember how the original betting went, but it was probably $10-$15 straddle with 5 players. I'm in late position with Ah, 2d, 7h, 8d.... not great, but I definitely want to see a flop with it..... The flop 4s, 5c, 10h. It checks to me and I bet about $50 into the $60 pot. There are 4 callers. The turn is 9h .... I bet about $90 and there are 2 callers, Bill and Elvie. The river is another 4... so not my monster hand on the turn has turned into a great big 'ol pile of crap. Flopping nut low draw and turning an open ended straight and the nut flush draw.... and neither get there. Bill leads out with a bet and we all fold.

Well that's poker!

Back to the felt......

Thursday, May 10, 2007

A Letter from PPA President Michael Bolcerek

Copied from email to PPA Members sent on May 10, 2007

Dear Fellow PPA Member:

I have wonderful news to report! On Thursday, April 26, Rep. Barney Frank introduced HR 2046, the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act of 2007. HR 2046 will lift the prohibition on playing poker online. Your efforts are making a difference!

Representative Frank is the Chairman of the important House Financial Services Committee. And he understands the injustice that we have suffered. When he introduced the bill, he told reporters that “The existing legislation is an inappropriate interference on the personal freedom of Americans and this interference should be undone”.

But he can’t do this job alone. Now, we need to help Congressman Frank build support for his bill.

You can regain your right to enjoy safe, secure online poker – but only if you stand up for your rights. And PPA is here to help you do just that.

This is a landmark day for freedom. But it is only the first step of the process. Join me in celebrating this milestone – and take action to build support for HR 2046.

Click here or below to make your voice heard in our nation’s Capitol.

Sincerely,
Michael Bolcerek
President
Poker Players Alliance

I apologize that I wasn't able to insert the links for you to click to get to your representatives in Washington, but here it is for your use.

http://activate.pokerplayersalliance.org/start.php?rindex=1


JOIN THE POKER PLAYERS ALLIANCE TODAY!
http://www.pokerplayersalliance.org/

Copied from email to PPA Members sent on May 10, 2007

Full Tilt Commercial

Poker Run? No Chance

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

http://www.newsobserver.com/722/story/572243.html

Poker Run? No Chance

By Jim Nesbitt, Staff Writer, News and Observer

For their first big fundraiser in eight years, David Bench and the Cary Crime Stoppers thought they had a sure-fire gimmick: a classic motorcycle poker run.

Instead, they found themselves on the verge of violating the law to raise money to fight crime.

Poker is illegal in North Carolina, as underscored last week by an N.C. Court of Appeals ruling. Even charity games violate the state's broadly worded gambling statutes, although law enforcement officials and district attorneys rarely shut down the action of a legitimate group raising money for a good cause.

Under state law, playing or running any game of chance is a Class 2 misdemeanor, unless there's an exemption, as there is for the N.C. Education Lottery or charity bingo and raffles. Poker isn't exempted; nor is the game's motorcycle derivative, a no-skill game of chance in which bikers pay an entry fee and ride to five locations, drawing a card at each stop.

At the end of the run, the biker with the top poker hand claims the top prize. For the Cary Crime Stoppers event May 19, that would be $250 in cash; the rest of the pot would line the coffers of the nonprofit, which gives cash rewards to people who call in crime tips.

But Cary Crime Stoppers faced a second problem of the public relations variety. In late March, Cary police raided a several-nights-a-week poker game run out of a warehouse, arresting at least 41.

The raid was based on a tip filed with Cary Crime Stoppers, said Bench, a retired Nortel employee who took the helm of the nonprofit in 2004. The mass arrest angered Triangle poker aficionados, who say their favorite card game should be legal because they think it is a contest of skill rather than chance.

And once they learned about Cary Crime Stoppers' poker run, they lit up local poker blogs to complain about the apparent hypocrisy.

"We got bit by our own anti-crime," Bench said. "The poker players in the area kind of got up wagging their fingers at us. If Cary police had not made that raid, we probably would have gotten away with it."

In preparing for the raid, Cary police Capt. Dave Wulff said he discovered the poker run was illegal.

"You have to be concerned about public perception, but you really need to make sure you're doing the right thing," said Wulff, whose wife, Linda, is one of four corporate sponsors of the Crime Stoppers event.

When Cary police contacted his office, Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby said, his assistants told police the prosecutor doesn't go after charity poker games or gambling events.

They also passed along a bit of advice.

"On the heels of arresting somebody in a poker raid, it was probably bad public relations," Willoughby said. "That might affect their ability to raise money."

So, Bench said, Cary Crime Stoppers decided to drop the poker run concept.

They'll still hold the charity motorcycle ride May 19. Instead of cards, they'll give each biker raffle tickets at each stop -- then hold a drawing. Charity raffles are a legal exemption of state gambling laws.

That leaves only one small problem, Bench said. About 100 custom-made pins that will be given to riders were ordered before the switch and still bear the words poker run.

http://www.newsobserver.com/722/story/572243.html

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

O8 - Short night!

We had a very small crowd at the Juice's last night. As a matter of fact, the first soft night we've had there that I can remember. The fun started when the Juice joined the table and raised pre-flop every hand that he played for the about first 8-10 hands. The one big pot that I was involved in... in the short time that we played let me win the high half... The Juice pumped it up to $30 pre-flop and there were 4 callers, when it gets around to John M, he raised it an additional $100. The Juice calls and I push all-in for another $161. Rick calls, John M pushes all-in with the big stack and everyone calls. Pre-flop, no limit, Omaha high-low and everyone is all-in pre-flop! Whee! I liked my hand, but would have loved to had a deuce with it.... I've got Ac, Ad, Jc, 10s. The flop hits me like a ton of bricks with a couple of high cards and 2 clubs. The turn gives me the nut flush and the river brings in the low. Rick and I chop the main pot!

The game didn't last much longer after that one....

Back to the felt!

Monday, May 07, 2007

Review of Texas Poker Raids and Legislation

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Poker Rooms Raise Concerns

Dallas: Players upset about raids; some locals want halls to stay closed
By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News

Poker players grumbling over police raids that shut down a veterans' Texas hold 'em game and other card-playing joints are hoping for relief from a bill that would expand legalized poker rooms.

Police say the April 14 raid on the Audie Murphy Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 1837 in Far East Dallas was spurred by neighborhood complaints, which they say are the driving force behind the past year's stepped-up enforcement of illegal poker rooms.

So far this year, vice detectives have cited players or operators at four poker rooms, the same number as all of last year. At least 79 people have received citations for playing or operating games.

In 2006, 147 poker players received Class C misdemeanor gambling tickets, which carry a maximum of a $500 fine. Thirty-five people accused of running the joints were arrested for Class A misdemeanors.

In 2005, police raided only one poker operation.

"The law is on the books," said Deputy Chief Julian Bernal, commander of Dallas' vice and narcotics detectives. "The Police Department doesn't have much choice. What are we going to do, ignore this?"

Bob Hinton, an attorney representing the VFW, said post members busted in the raid "are harmless people trying to do something for a good cause." He said he seriously doubts that residents are in an uproar over illegal poker rooms in Dallas.

Chief Bernal said that in all four cases this year, operators of the games were all taking a cut of the poker pots, known as a "rake," which makes them illegal.

"I'd much rather go after people who are running prostitution and narcotics," he said, adding that he hopes the raids will persuade players to cease breaking the law.

"The more gambling operations I have to contend with, the less resources I have to deal with our higher-priority operations."

Mr. Hinton said his clients "don't take a rake. They are given donations. The rest goes to charity."

Chief Bernal "doesn't have Ross Perot beating down his door demanding that these people stop playing $30-a-night poker," he said. "My heart goes out to Bernal. He's got to say something. But that's bull about concerned citizens."

Shocked by raids

For poker players, the raids can be jarring.

"They busted open a window and came through there," said lawyer Wes Holmes, one of the 23 people cited for playing poker at Jackie's on Forest Lane in November. "I was sitting at the table with two women in their 50s or early 60s. They were bawling, shaking and crying. There were screams. It was a mess."

Unlike most accused players, who plead guilty and pay a fine generally under $500, Mr. Holmes said he has pleaded not guilty because he didn't know the house was taking a rake.

Poker enthusiast Dan Michalski said he can see plenty of things he'd rather see police doing besides writing tickets and arresting his friends for playing poker.

"We're surrounded by drugs and gangs and prostitution" in the Munger Place neighborhood where he lives in Old East Dallas. "There's plenty of gunfire. It would be nice if it stopped."

For the thousands of poker players who regularly log onto his Web site, Pokerati.com, the Dallas raids have been a hot topic for a year. For many, the VFW was a low blow.

"These guys fought for our country," wrote one player who claims to have been at the VFW when it was busted. "The 'V' was the 'Cheers' of places to play poker and will be sadly missed."

VFW members declined to publicly comment on the advice of Mr. Hinton.

But some say their game is not very different from the many well-publicized Texas hold 'em tournaments benefiting charities all over town.

"The issue is that in those games you make a donation to the charity and they give you chips," Chief Bernal said. "You cannot cash your chips in and get anything back – win, lose or draw. The VFW had cash games, and they knew they were illegal."

Tips on the rise

Last year, Dallas vice received 50 complaints about illegal gambling, which also includes tips on eight-liner rooms, Chief Bernal said. That was more than double the number from a year prior.

So far this year, there have been 31 complaints. The department could not say how many of these complaints applied specifically to poker.

Tips are increasing, police say, as the number of poker rooms grows because of the popularity of Texas hold 'em, the card game driving a multibillion-dollar annual industry across the U.S.

In 2006, the four raids conducted by Dallas vice mostly were in northwestern Dallas near Stemmons Freeway, according to police.

The VFW bust on a recent Saturday night was part of this year's first round of raids – which have concentrated on East Dallas.

Forty-seven players at the VFW were cited, as well as a dozen operators. Police seized a dozen poker tables and $6,882 from the post, which is tucked into a shopping center on Lakeland Drive at Ferguson Road between a hair shop and a defunct dollar store.

The night before, vice also hit the AMVETS Post 106 a mile and a half east on Ferguson Road, writing nine gambling tickets and seizing seven tables. Officers confiscated $776. A pool hall a few doors down in the same rundown Oates Plaza shopping center was also cited for running a gambling operation, police said.

It turns out that, while some of the folks inside the AMVETS may have been veterans, the post was not a full-fledged post. Its charter is pending, said officials with the group's state headquarters in Dallas.

Vice had been to the AMVETS location before. In late January, before the veterans logo went up, police seized 22 eight-liner machines and $3,376. Investigators say gambling outfits sometimes purport to be – or actually apply and secure charters to be – affiliates of real organizations in order to appear legitimate.

No one at the AMVETS location could be reached for comment.

'I'm afraid'

While several neighbors said the poker and eight-liner operations at the Oates Plaza shopping center didn't bother them, one longtime resident said she was fed up.

The woman, who didn't want her name used, said the operations attract scofflaws and generally run down the neighborhood.

"It's like a little Las Vegas," she said. "I've had bottles thrown in my yard. I've been here 42 years. I'm afraid. I didn't used to be."

Susan Walker, a community activist who lives near the Audie Murphy VFW, has been involved in efforts to clean up the Ferguson Road corridor.

"I applaud the police department for listening to our reports and doing their job," she said. "Letting illegal gambling halls exist in your back yard invites other types of more serious crime."

But Kaye Bradley, who lives down the street from the AMVETS post, says problems have nothing to do with illegal gambling.

"We have more trouble with the fights at the washateria than with the AMVETS post," she said. "As long as they're not hurting people, who the hell cares."

The raids have forced some players to give up on the North Texas underground scene, consisting of an estimated 200 poker operations, opting instead for legal games in Oklahoma or Louisiana.

The long drives may not be necessary for long if House Bill 3186, which would expand legalized poker rooms, becomes law. Last week, the proposal, sponsored by Rep. Jose Menendez, D-San Antonio, was voted out of committee and was being considered for a vote by the full House.

Lawmakers have through Monday to move the bill forward, said Don Jones, a former reserve deputy and spokesman for Mr. Menendez's office.

He said the bill has faced little active opposition, and some police officers have expressed their support for it – albeit privately.

"We respect the fact that the police organizations can't come forward and support us," he said. "We haven't had any police group come in here and tell us they oppose this, that they love busting these rooms."

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Sunday, May 06, 2007

A Saturday Nite Game!

A little unusual for me as I'm normally doing family stuff on the weekends, but as fate would have it, a group of my poker buddies decided to put together a game to watch the big fight! Turned into a rousing $2/$5 No Limit Omaha 8 game....

There were a couple of significant hands for me. In one, I've got As, Ac, 4s, 5s and there's a pre-flop straddle to $29. As usual there are about 7 limpers including me and the Juice (the straddle originator) decides to bump it up. He raises another $150 and when it gets to me there are already 3 callers. I would have preferred to have at least a deuce in my hand, but I do like my hand and much prefer it against one player rather than a table so I push all-in for an additional $614.... the Juice smooth calls. I think he did it just to see my cards. Everyone else folds and he ends up making the low with an A, 2 and we chop the pot.

Shortly thereafter I have Ac, 3d, 5d, 6s and call the pre-flop $11 straddle. The flop was 2d, 4d, 7s. I don't remember who bet first, but it was about a $70 bet and Elvie called and I pushed all-in for another $800 or so and Elvie called. Although the steel-wheel didn't get there, I did scoop with the wheel.

I guess I'm still getting over having everyone on the planet show me the cooler or hitting their one or two outer on me, but I missed a big bet opportunity against Rick. I was in the big blind and called a $15 straddle with Qc, Qd, 3c, 3s. I know, I shouldn't have. But John M is complaining about how few hands I play so I thought that I would give it a shot. At any rate, there about 7 players in and the flop 8d, 8s, 10d. Everyone checks and the turn is sweet..... Qd! I've got the best boat, but there are a couple of hands that can beat me. At any rate, I really like it, but decide to slow play to see if someone else will bet. No bets! It checks all the way around. The river is another 10! Now, although I like my boat, it's now the fourth nut. I lead out with a $100 bet and right behind me, Rick raises $125. If you've been reading my blogs of late, you've seen that just about every monster hand that I've had, Rick has had the cooler. So rather than raise, which was my instinctive play, I just call. He says we probably have the same hand and I let out a groan, realizing that I probably could have raised and he would have called. Oh well, I'm not complaining as at least I did get the pot.

Oh well..... back to the felt!

Durham: Poker Tabletop with 4 PokerCams!






Durham: Poker Tabletop with 4 PokerCams!



This poker tabletop has been customized with four color poker cams, just like you see on all the TV poker shows. Seats eight, so there's room to add four more cams. Output from each cams is a standard video RCA plug to most any video device (VCR, DVD recorder, videocam, quad box video mixer, TIVO, etc.).



$250 negotiable, or will trade for a Sony Ericsson cell phone with MP3 and IR (infrared) capability (any model).



Saturday, May 05, 2007

At least I had the discipline to lay it down..

I had an intersting hand on Tuesday at Tommy's in which I laid down the best hand, but I'm still proud of the lay down given the circumstances. I had pocket fives in early poisiton and got to see a 7 way limped pot ($21 in the pot). The flop came K 9 5 rainbow. With little danger on the board I slow played but got no bettors. The turn was a 3 with still no flush draw. "Brent" who was on the big blind to start led out for $20, (Brent likes to inflate pots so pot sized bets were very common for him.) I called and then "Shawn" raises to $75, about half of his stack. Brent immediately goes all-in for $320 total. Wow! This got active in a hurry.

I was certain that one of these guys had to have had a set the way it played out, if not both. So that means that the two hands that could beat me 99 or KK were extremely likely. I didn't think Shawn, who was on the button had KK, but he could've limped with 99. But if he had the goods and Brent didn't, I would come out about even on the hand. Brent however, had displayed in a couple of times playing with him an occasional willingness to limp with AA or KK in unusual positions (a strategy I have seen quite a bit from pot inflators that does make some sense if they're willing to take the risk). If Brent has the goods, I lose all of my money.

So I go into a painfully grinding 5 minute think in which I flash my fives to Tommy and another player. I finally decided to lay my set down. And Shawn turns up 33. Brent then disgustedly showed 53. I then got a big grin on my face and rationalized "Well I knew I was in set v set." However given that I only lost $23 on the hand and that two of the three available sets beat me I believe this to be a great laydown if only because of the discipline involved. I think the fact that I was thinking "trap" as soon as the flop hit might have contributed to this laydown since it was just as easy for others to trap as well.

Later in the night I did have a huge CORRECT laydown against Shawn. I had 8 6 and saw a five-way limped pot. the flop was 8 6 2. I bet $12 and Shawn called. the turn was a 9. I bet out $18, Shawn then popped it up to $78. This seemed like an ecitement bet to me and I didn't think too long before pitching an exposed 8 6 into the muck. Shawn was curteous enough to show his 9 8.

$2/$5 Pot Limit Omaha 8

Went down south to play a little poker this evening and within the first 10 minutes of sitting down, I picked up Ac, 3c, 3s, 4s.... Not the best hand, but I like it! At any rate, I'm in late position and there's no raise of the $10 straddle. The flop came Js, Ks, 3x...... it's funny about bottom set in O8. It's very likely that if you make the boat, there's a good chance that you'll finish 2nd. But I do like to change up how I play it.... sometimes I'll just check it down and see what happens. Other times, I like to take control and try to bet the other guys off their draws. Well, there's about $75 in the pot and I'm feeling froggy. It checks to me and I bet the pot. There are 3 callers including Elvie and Chad (a new guy to me, I believe that he has been playing here regularly for a while). At any rate, the turn is I think a 6 and it checks to me again. Now I'm sure that have the best hand right now so I push it.... there is exactly $300 in the pot and I have $305. Everyone calls and I told Chuck to try to throw a brick. Somehow the 9 on the river dodges all the flush, straight draws and the 2 over pair and I scoop about a $1200 pot!

I did get hooked up in one other big hand just before I left that took about $250 out of my stack. I had As, 2s, 3c, 4d and the 8s, 8c, 7s flop could have been better, but I liked it. Chad led out with a bet of the pot which I believe was $40. He was in early position and I haven't played enough with him to have a good idea of his betting patterns, but with all of my draws to the low, I definitely wanted to see another card. Now there are 3-4 players behind me and all fold except Akash. The turn was a black Jack, but not the spade. Chad bets the pot again for $160. Unfortunately for me I had put him on just an 8 with a big kicker. So now I'm thinking that a low spade might give me a scooper. I call and Akash calls. The river, a black Queen, but not the spade. Chad checks and I check and Akash struggles with it, but checks. Chad flopped a boat 8's full of 7's and Akash had the big 8 that never connected on the turn and the river so Chad scooped a nice pot.

I couldn't stay late, so I left the merry group around 11:00PM.... they still had 9 folks at the table and I'm certain there were juicy pots!

Texas Poker Bill Goes to Vote Next Week

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Texas Poker Bill Goes to Vote Next Week

Despite its namesake - Texas Hold'em - being one of its most certifiable claims to fame, real-money poker for profit (outside the players) still isn't legal in Texas. Until, possibly, next week.

A recent bill engineered by San Antonio state representative Jose Menendez is about to go up for a full vote in the state House of Representatives, with legal, real-money, public poker its objective.

Poker has been allowed previously in Texas, of course, as long as nobody financially benefits from the game outside of its players.

But this bill is to allow for poker at racetracks, bars and entertainment establishments, with gaming licenses approved by the state and usually limiting operators to small-scale poker rooms under four tables.

"Poker could bring in millions of dollars in tourism and television," Menendez told the San Antonio Express-News, "instead of being a law enforcement liability.

"Texas ought to benefit from the game."

Texans could be playing legal public poker early next year if the bill goes through, and it only needs a simple majority in the House to pass.

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Friday, May 04, 2007

Omaha 8 & Hold'em

Well, it was another exciting night with the Juice.... John M took down a couple of monster pots in O8 proclaiming "DOUBLE NUTS!" which is always exciting. He quartered me in a nice pot early on.... get this, how unlucky can I be...! O8 and I'm holding 2s, 3s, 4d, 5d and there's a standard pre-flop straddle to $15. I almost re-popped it, but decided against it. The flop hit me like bad Thai food. Ad, 4s, 5c! Sweet! I've been modifying my betting over there to try to catch a few guys off guard. I normally may have checked that flop, but decided to bump it up. I bet $40 and there are a couple of callers including John M. I like my wheel with straight flush draws and two pair. The turn brings another Ace. I bet $80 and everyone folds to John, he smooth calls. The river is a harmless 8 and John checks. I have him on an Ace, but not much else and think that a big bet might make him go away. So I bet out $125 and he pushes all-in. Now I'm thinking that he may have a wheel too and maybe a boat, but how unlikely could it be both! I call... he quarters me with Aces full of fives and the wheel! Wow! What a cooler! I held 2, 3, 4, 5 and he is holding A, 2, 3, 5..... and again the board..... A, 4, 5, A, 8..... I know, let's have a spelling contest! LOL... Nice hand, John!

I managed to re-build my meager stack to about $900 or so and receive a very nice set of hold cards for O8. There's a straddle and a raise and I smooth call. The flop is Kh, Jd, 9d. I'm in early position and I check. The Juice bets $80 and Rick calls and I call. The turn is another Jack and I check and the Juice bets $100. Rick folds and I raise it to $200. He makes a motion as if he is going to push all-in and then he mucks. Boy, talk about puckering up! He has been playing me very conservatively as of late and I thought that with a raise that I could take it down. My hole cards were Ac, 2s, 3c, 4s. The board, a complete wiff.... When he folded he said "you had a monster, didn't you?" and I said something like "I had a K, J and if you had re-raised me I would have probably folded." As far as the reason for the conservative play, he says that it is because he hates me and doesn't want to give me ANY chips, but I guess if that is true, then I should probably take advantage of it.... Oooops... I probably shouldn't have said that!

I didn't stay late.... I guess I'm just getting old! At any rate, Happy Birthday John M and many more sir..... and a very nice scoop for the night!

Looking for Lousy Poker Players

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Know any lousy poker players?

Economist Steven Levitt, author of the enormously popular book Freakonomics, is undertaking a project on poker. He has set up a website, www.pokernomics.com, for people to download their hand histories. Using these hands, he hopes to study what differentiates good and bad poker players.

Here’s a message from Steven on the project:

The response has been overwhelming. I think we’ve got over 7 million poker hands already. (For those of you who sent hands, but don’t have your Freakonomics book and t-shirt yet, be patient, they are coming, but we haven’t been able to keep up with the back orders.)

Other than being buried in data, my only problem is that everyone who is sending in hands is a good player! This makes sense. If you aren’t a good player, you tend to quit. So the majority of people who amass huge hand histories are winning players. Also, I suppose it is more satisfying to send your hand histories to me if you are poker star than a poker dud.

But to really tell the good players from the rotten, I need some more losers!

Just to show that I am serious, I started playing online poker a few weeks ago, and tracking my hands. I’m determined to make it to 10,000 hands so I can be a data point in my own study, no matter how much it costs me.

So if you are as bad as me at poker, or know somoene like that, please send them to www.pokernomics.com. My initial look at the data makes me think that I can give players (especially bad players!) some useful insights on how to do better.

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Howard Fierman Responds to Recent NC Court of Appeals Poker Ruling


Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Howard Fierman Responds to Recent NC Court of Appeals Poker Ruling

Full text of Fierman’s appeal available at www.trianglepokerjournal.com

The case went on appeal August 23, 2006. Earlier this week the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that poker is a game of chance and not skill, saying that while skill can enhance a player’s chance of winning, the luck of the draw means poker is ultimately a game of chance.

By Howard Fierman, Special to the Triangle Poker Journal

North Carolina law prohibits individuals from wagering on games of chance. The basis of my lawsuit is that because poker is a game of "SKILL" it is perfectly lawful for individuals to wager at the game and also legal for me to become a proprietor of an establishment where people would play poker for money. The original trial was held in Durham County in May of 2005. In order to have this matter brought before the judge at that time, we promised to make our case concisely and limit the trial to one day. We therefore produced only 4 witnesses who testified from their experience and knowledge of poker. The main witness was Mr. Roy Cooke. Roy is the feature writer for Card Player Magazine. In the limited time available, Roy and the other witnesses testified about the various skills that permit an individual to elevate his/her game to a level where he/she could have a winning expectation. The other side offered only one witness who claimed that he observed a television poker event where Mr. Phil Hellmuth played Mr. Antonio Esfandieri in a "Heads up Match". During that match, there was a particular hand where both players were "All In" and the television graphic showed that Mr. Hellmuth had a 91% chance to win the hand as the last card was about to be dealt. The witness further testified that Mr. Esfandieri was lucky enough to receive his gut card to make a straight and win the pot. The conclusion made by this witness was that "Luck" would prevail over "Skill" every time.

The ultimate decision of the judge was that he wasn't able to determine whether "Skill" or "Chance" "predominated" in the game of poker, so he therefore determined that "Poker is a game of chance".

The attorney who handled the appeal was one of the team of lawyers who represented me at the original trial. It is important to note that although he is a very capable lawyer, he is not knowledgeable about poker and he has very little experience with the appeals process which is extremely complicated and precise.

MY OPINIONS ABOUT THE DECISION:

1. I think that my attorney did a great job. He worked very hard preparing and presenting this appeal. I regret that part of the appeal was dismissed for procedural reasons, but I believe that the main issue was heard by the Appeals Court, and that is really what is important.

2. I believe that the decision from the Court of Appeals was very well written but it only illustrates the lack of intimate knowledge of poker that would be required in order to reach the proper decision that poker is indeed a game of "Skill".

3. Every substantive book and article of instruction about poker emphasizes that "Winning at poker is not an event, it is a process." When we embrace and understand this concept we begin to see that successful poker is about luring one's opponents into making poor or mathematically improper decisions. Everyone, except "Poker Brat" has learned that when we make prudent and proper decisions we receive long term rewards in the form of "positive expectations". We expect to sometimes loose to the 2 outer on the river. We embrace that occasional loss as part of our overall "positive expectation".

4. The Attorney General, the original trial judge, and The Court of Appeals failed to comprehend this issue that is the core concept in the various games of poker.

5. Today's ruling agrees that in the long run the more skilled player will probably amass the greater number of chips. It however states that since a novice player can get lucky on an individual hand or in a short span of time that luck or chance plays a superior role in the game of poker.

I believe that we as poker players need to organize our thoughts and speak loudly and positively in every forum that becomes available to us.

Background:

While luck is a factor, Fierman believes poker is a predominantly a game of skill, just like pool, bowling, or golf, any of which you can legally bet on in North Carolina. Curious about the law? See NC Statutes 14.292 and 14.293 at the NC Gambling Laws page.

Photo of Howard Fierman by George Smart.

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Thursday, May 03, 2007

NC Court of Appeals Rejects Poker as Skill


Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal


NC Court of Appeals Rejects Poker as Skill

by George Smart, Editor

The case went on appeal August 23, 2006. Today the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that poker is a game of chance and not skill, saying that while skill can enhance a player’s chance of winning, the luck of the draw means poker is ultimately a game of chance.

Background:

Making state and local papers in the last two years is a well-tanned entrepreneur from Cary, an avid golfer (hence the tan) whose venture, according to the state, wasn't even legal. He took the state to court, lost, and is now kicking it up a notch -- to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

What is this golfer up to? Howard Fierman wants poker declared as a game of skill, not as a game of chance (and therefore illegal) as the state now interprets it. This ruling means Fierman could open a local poker room where the house takes a fee (called a rake) for each hand dealt, just like in Las Vegas or Atlantic City or the many card rooms in California and elsewhere.
While luck is a factor, Fierman believes poker is a game of skill, just like pool, bowling, or golf, any of which you can legally bet on in North Carolina. Curious? See NC Statutes 14.292 and 14.293 at the NC Gambling Laws page.

California's decades-old discussion of how to evaluate poker led to that state's determination that poker was a game of more of skill than luck.

"A game is not to be regarded as one of skill merely because that element enters into the result in some degree, or as one of chance solely because chance is a factor in producing the result. The test of the character of a game or scheme as one of chance or skill is, which of these factors is dominant in determining the result?” -- People v. Settles, Appellate Department, Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, 1938.

Fierman wants a similar determination here in North Carolina. He realized he had to get case law to support him. To do that meant going to court. Fierman wrote Durham District Attorney Jim Hardin in 2004 and asked for his opinion on a proposed casino-style poker room. Fierman also incorporated as The Joker Club LLC and proceeded to sign a lease for a what he called a "shack" off I-85 in Durham. When Hardin responded that such a business would be illegal, Fierman lost his lease on the building.

Local TV crews were quick to film the rundown building. "Despite what the media reported, I never intended to open at that facility," says Fierman. In fact, he chose the cheapest building he could in part knowing that Hardin's likely opinion would deep-six it. Why? Such a loss establishes legal standing (something at stake) to pursue the larger question of legal poker. Without this standing, it would have been very difficult to bring a case to trial.

With a lost lease as legal standing, and using attorneys Marcus Hill, Allen Powell, and Butch Williams, he sued DA Jim Hardin. Durham Judge Orlando Hudson upheld Hardin and the state's position in 2005. Despite Hudson's ruling, Fierman cites Hardin's and Hudson's fairness and responsiveness to his legal requests. However, he finds major faults with Hudson's ruling -- and these constitute the basis for the appeal.

According to Fierman, Judge Hudson failed to judge the case on its merits. The majority of the evidence and witnesses presented supported poker as primarily a game of skill. Chance plays a part, but only a small part. Instead, Judge Hudson erroneously concluded that "the Legislature has the authority to determine whether poker is a game of skill or a game of chance, and to make a clear decision as to whether poker is allowed in North Carolina." Then, interestingly, Judge Hudson went on to rule that poker was a game of chance.

Fierman wants to remove poker from the back rooms and elevate its image from an "under the table" activity to an entertainment and skill-testing opportunity for the masses, just like bowling and billiards. He is also acutely aware that playing poker in private home games can be dangerous for a number of reasons: frequent cheating, potential for personal injury, and robbery.

Legalizing and regulating the game would also bring jobs, local tax revenue, and greater security for players within a casino environment. If eventually approved and licensed, building, staffing, and running a casino will take tons of cash, but Fierman is confident he'll get all he needs. "People are calling begging me to invest, but I won't accept investors until the chances of success are very high." For now, he bankrolls the attorneys and expert witnesses by himself. His extensive network of poker authorities, including Mike Sexton, Daniel Negreanu, Roy Cooke, and others are on call to present a powerful array of arguments and data to support a definition of poker as primarily skill-based.

The recently approved state lottery also has relevance to Fierman's project. "The lottery, though nothing to do with poker, had taught us that the general public has become desensitized to gambling to the point that they just don't care."

Fierman has a precise memory. He quotes statutes and case law word-for-word. He recites a poem from Omar Khayyam as easily as he describes pot odds. This is a man who is always thinking many moves ahead. Says Fierman, "Poker is about maneuvering situations where you have mathematical or psychological advantage to win."


Full Text of Appeal may be found in PDF format at www.trianglepokerjournal.com/

Photo of Howard Fierman by George Smart.


Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

NC Court of Appeals Rules Poker Is A Game Of Chance, Thus Illegal

http://www.newsobserver.com/141/story/569827.html

Poker Table For Sale

Handcrafted poker table. Green casino felt, cherry racetrack and red armrest...nice. $400. Let me know if you are interested!

Democrat proposes lifting federal ban on Net gambling





Copied from CNETNews.com

Democrat proposes lifting federal ban on Net gambling

By Declan McCullagh, Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Just six months after President Bush signed a law outlawing online gambling, a key Democratic politician has proposed lifting the ban.

Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, on Thursday introduced a bill that would replace the current broad prohibition with strict regulations, including criminal background checks and financial disclosure, imposed on companies that seek to offer legal Internet gambling.

"The existing legislation is an inappropriate interference on the personal freedom of Americans and this interference should be undone," Frank said. His bill is called the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act.

Last year's legislation tried to eliminate many forms of online gambling by targeting Internet service providers and financial intermediaries, namely banks and credit card companies that process payments to offshore Web sites.

Those sites included ones like BetBug of Toronto; BetWWTS.com of Antigua; Bodog Sportsbook, Casino and Poker of Costa Rica; and Betfair, which has offices in London. Estimates typically put Internet gambling revenue at more than $12 billion a year.

The bill never received a formal up-or-down vote in the entire Congress. Instead, Republican congressional leaders have been criticized for gluing it onto an unrelated port security bill. The Senate unanimously approved the port security measure and it cleared the House of Representatives with only two dissenting votes.

Frank argues that because nearly all states already permit some form of traditional gambling--including lotteries, betting on horse and greyhound racing, and sports wagering--the federal government should legalize and regulate the online equivalents. Instead of a blanket legalization, his legislation would require the Treasury Department to police the industry and ensure that it takes adequate steps to identify minors and compulsive gamblers.

The World Trade Organization ruled in March, for a second time, that the U.S. ban on gambling violates international trade rules and sided with the Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda. But the tiny nation has little leverage to force any changes to federal law.

There are signs that the 2006 Net gambling ban has had an impact on the industry. In November, the British site BetOnSports agreed to cease signing up U.S. customers. BetOnSports' founder, Gary Stephen Kaplan, was arrested earlier this month in the Dominican Republic and faces criminal charges in the United States. In addition, payment processor Neteller in February said it would cut about 250 jobs as a response to the gambling crackdown.
Content by:


Copied from CNETNews.com

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Famous Poker Quotes...

"When we play, we must realize, before anything else, that we are out to make money."

-------------David Sklansky