Sunday, July 08, 2007

Lawyer raises stakes against Washington State's Internet poker ban

Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal


Suit claims law really aims to protect gambling industry


Football buffs host holiday-grade parties for the year's Big Game. World Cup soccer zealots gather and sing anthems in nation-flagged bars. Tour de France fans camp along French highways to wait for the peloton.


So how does a poker aficionado kick off the year's biggest event, the World Series of Poker? If he's Renton-based attorney Lee Rousso, he does what comes natural: He goes all in with a lawsuit.


On Friday, as the poker championship began in Las Vegas, Rousso sued the state of Washington in an effort to overturn its 2006 ban on Internet poker. Calling it a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause, Rousso said the first legal challenge to the state law also should be the last.


"I think my chances are darn good," he said.


The ban, which took effect last spring, specifically prohibited the type of Internet-based card games such as Texas Hold 'Em that poker players in Washington -- Rousso among them -- have used to qualify for the annual multimillion-dollar tournament. Rousso said that Washington residents who qualified for the event likely did so through Internet-based tournaments even though it now is a felony to do so.


Susan Arland, spokeswoman for the Washington Gambling Commission, said commission lawyers have not seen the lawsuit and would comment only after they had read it. "We don't have anything to say just yet," she said.


Rousso said the state law is flawed. In his complaint in King County Superior Court, he argued that the state measure was passed not to put the state in compliance with the federal wire act -- something it does not do anyway, he said -- but instead to protect the in-state gambling industry, including card rooms and casinos.


This, he said, puts Washington in clear conflict with the Constitution's commerce clause, which forbids individual states from passing protectionist laws against other states' business.


Approved as Senate Bill 6613, Washington's law also banned Internet-based sport gambling. Lawmakers said it was an effort to put the state in compliance with the Interstate Wire Act. Originally approved in 1961, the act was a federal effort to limit betting on sports over the telephone.


No one has yet been prosecuted under the Washington law.


Internet card rooms boomed in 2003 when an unknown accountant and amateur card player named Chris Moneymaker won the world champion's bracelet after honing his craft solely on Internet Hold 'Em.


Moneymaker is Rousso's inspiration.


"He created the modern poker boom. He's a guy who everyone says, 'If he can do it why can't I?' "


This year's tournament is the largest in its 37-year history, with 12,000 players vying for the final table and eventually, the final seat and a first-prize worth more than $12 million. Prospective players can either qualify through satellite tournaments or by paying $10,000 up front to sit in.


Rousso, 49, qualified online for the 2005 World Series by winning an Internet tournament. He lasted 14 hours.


The Mercer Island native likes his chances better in court. If he loses there, he says, he'll push for legislation to return Internet poker to legal status. It never violated the Wire Act, he said, because the federal law refers only to sports gambling, not poker.


"Our backup plan is to get this done politically."





Copied from the Triangle Poker Journal

No comments: